1/3/2024 0 Comments Arbitrary coherence examples![]() He used mostly pictures and imagination, as his early thought experiments (Gedankenexperiment, see above) demonstrated. Wertheimer remarked that Einstein’s thinking was often far ahead of the available mathematical apparatus.Įinstein himself reported that his thinking was not bound to words. He emphasized that Einstein’s progress was characterized by structural changes which were driven by overcoming the traditional understanding of physical events, time and simultaneity. “Einstein did not put ready-made axioms, or mathematical formulas together.” (p. Wertheimer questioned that Einstein attained his great insight by the concatenation of logical operations. By using this insight, he relaxed the existing dogmas, and eventually the single pieces became part of a coherent picture. By that time, Einstein had the ingenious insight that the measurement of time is dependent on the applied frame of reference. According to Wertheimer, Einstein experienced the intuition that the common presuppositions in physics might be wrong. It was unclear how such a new picture should look like. However, he was not able to put the single pieces together and arrange them in a new coherent picture. He realized that Einstein was already puzzled by apparent unanswerable questions at a very early stage, such as: “What would happen if one rode on a ray of light, or what would happen if one ran fast enough? Would the light stop to move?” Einstein felt an incoherence between the novel experimental findings at this time and the given theoretical assumptions. Wertheimer was keen to understand Einstein’s outstanding thinking. We provide a review of the most important findings, outline our model, present a large number of examples, deduce potential new paradigms and measures that might help to decipher the underlying cognitive processes.ĭuring 1916 Max Wertheimer, the famous Gestaltist, and Einstein had several discussions. The new search space enables new coherent states. For insight problem solving a fourth stage is necessary, which restructures the given representation after repeated failure, so that a new search space results. These three stages characterize intuition. ![]() If the coherent state does not fit the requirements of the task, the process re-enters at stage 1. The third stage is designated to evaluate the result of the coherence-building process and assess whether the given problem is solved or not. We adopted a fluency account assuming that the ease of information processing indicates the realization of a coherent state. The second stage is characterized by detecting a coherent state. This dynamic is a well-defined rule based process. The first stage starts with spreading activation restricted by constraints. We propose a four-stage model of coherence-building. ![]() However, there is still no proper framework defining the general principles of coherence-building. There are several accounts that address certain aspects of coherence-building. 3Philosophical Department, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, GermanyĬoherence-building is a key concept for a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms of intuition and insight problem solving. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |